Speech by Jean-Luc Manoury on axis 4
Mr. President, Dear
colleagues
the policy debate Budget and the budget that follows is the major political act of any executive, because through the receipts and expenditures selected, the majority defines the policy it intends to pursue.
In this introductory report of 55 pages we are asked to discuss, advise on projects, without having any evidence overall budget.
other words, we do not know where it goes, but it would rule on the interest of the trip.
This report is whether a particular context of institutional change in 2014, he Whether the tax reform which we see the first consequences or even the continuing economic crisis.
First we will kill local democracy with the election of a territorial councilor elected is elected in two rounds, to the detriment of democratic pluralism, to the detriment of the representation of all regional components and above all with the avowed aim of making disappear the National Front regional assemblies.
The most serious is that the decline of local democracy is a dangerous double down "decentralization "To eliminate what Sarkozy considers" local-cons' and 'small barons'.
and then again in the context of this open debate on the budget guidelines, the announced reform of business tax. It was true that a tax on the investment and encourage the relocation of our business but without real compensation that tax our community will be deprived of any leverage. Yes we
massacre of local democracy and despite the constitutional recognition of the principle of free administration of territorial recognition is violated, trampled by a small foot president who tries in vain to gain height. Finally
a dire economic situation with almost 10% of job seekers and a 40% increase in one year or interim 22000 in September. In 2004, you had to be the president of the re-industrialization, the President of the job but after 7 years of socialism in Lorraine is worsening injustice, precarious jobs and the impoverishment of workers.
Before the dark clouds gathering over the Lorraine region, you held this year in charge guidance document your budget slices. It certainly was to show that you had made efforts to structure your approach.
This is really in your favor?
You've laid the foundation of your work around 4 axes after 13 when they were big projects, 8 in other budgets and whatnot!
Finally, only theme changes to give the appearance of novelty, you knit and unravel the plans of your reports for the sole beauty of the gesture, as if our work is more than just looking for you as a kind of part monte where it is constantly changing the order of sentences to give the appearance of novelty.
But the reality of the new? Never
And besides, it would be the point?
Thanks to this method, hocus-pocus, you authorize us to reused the same dish each year simply to accommodate you in a different way and linking it with a sauce or more less rich.
This indeed is six years we are taught each year as the region's ambition, that the territories are the engine of development, green economy that will put an end to unemployment, as new forms of solidarity are being built. I can continue to list the phrases, the phrases. As
page 6 of the report, or it says " developing a regional strategy for development of Lorraine gives more responsibility than authority. This responsibility is both to share regional issues with all the actors on the regional territory and to mobilize its own policies to address these issues "
A
Boileau for whom "what is well conceived is clearly" you prefer the poems of Paul Valery to the phrases over and over again indolent pace, the feeling of a lazy apathy assumed.
All this has been successful 6 years but how will you also 4 years with little innovation to offer. Here we examine your policy planning but I searched in vain for this ambitious Lorraine.
National Front as a constructive opposition in the House, played the game to be a genuine force and to offer proposals to the Regional Council Lorraine fruits of his reflections.
For example, in October 2008 during a debate on building a city of European standing Lorraine had issued a doubt because I saw a watermark concentrations of population, urbanism conqueror, disfiguring the landscape, with ghettos in some areas like New York with the resulting insecurity and a crisis with environmental pollution of air, water and soil and I was asking whether this design was metropolisation still relevant and necessary for the development of our territories.
Spatial the common area was in my 4 problems to be solved perennial
First infrastructure because it is fine to have solved the problem of a saturated A31 is now a hindrance to the smooth flow of trade and initiate rapid realization of interconnection station TGV TER Vandières.
Then the establishment of businesses that can install if these infrastructures are present, if the land is serviced, the price per m2 is not prohibitive and competitive compared to other regions. It will rely
SME and SOHO account for 9 out of 10 institutions and weigh heavily in the regional economy as it currently creates 50% of the value added and 45% of regional employment with nearly 80,000 establishments.
Then an offer of habitat in a protected environment.
Demography is too low I wrote the need to attract new residents, especially young with attractive prices compared to Nancy or Metz taking into account if necessary reversibility of farmland in a process of environmental protection.
Finally
offer in terms of quality of life by focusing on the development of services such as childcare and services to the person or on the cultural (cinema, theater, concert hall) and to show concern for the environment, defense of maintaining the harmony of the landscape.
These remarks, made two years ago are still relevant.
The National Front has always made great efforts to amend your proposal as a more interventionist regional and encourage you to undertake structural adjustments, able define flow irrigators economic activity Lorraine to create conditions for economic prosperity and always for the sake of equality between rural and urban.
The land we believe is linked to wealth creation, launching major structural projects for building new public facilities.
The Malthusian approach that is common at your school of thought is to share poverty rather than wealth creation has shown that the opposite could be harmful.
ideology that led to 35 hours following the fallacy that the amount of work available is finite, the only solution to offer everyone would share it.
aberration Your decentralization is to consider that France has reached its optimum equipment and it would suffice to change the distribution. This scheme
archaic and outdated, this pattern which dates back to 1960 that you follow from your arrival at the head of the region. It does not boosts disaster area by transferring equipment, government, companies that made the richness of a neighbor.
What I am saying is that in France we lack housing, jobs, we run businesses.
So should we only distribute them otherwise? Certainly not! We must let those who thrive in areas where they are necessarily developed and we must encourage the creation of new territories that do not.
is what must be a responsible land use, development of abundance.
Georges Clemenceau said: "We must know what we want. When we know it must have the courage to say. When we say, we must have the courage to do "
's all the good we want to Lorraine.
Thank you for your attention.
Speech by Jean-Luc Manoury (CR Lorraine)
sent Front54 . - The Info Live Video.
